Unfortunately
and unsurprisingly, this does not sound unfamiliar or unique to any one
particular encounter with the police. However, this is what some 200
prostitutes reported when describing their interactions with the NYPD in interviews with Human Rights Watch.
Following Brooklyn's lead, the Manhattan district attorney announced this week that they will be cutting back on their seizure of condoms as evidence in the arrest of prostitutes.
Taking away condoms to support the arrest of sex workers makes about as much sense as taking the seat belts from cars of drag-racers.
Such
seizures discourage offenders from arming themselves with protection
while engaging in risky behavior, for fear of getting caught red-handed.
From a public health and human rights standpoint, this is an
operational disaster.
True, the average citizen may not carry around more than one or two condoms during a night on the town, but what if they did? Would this be grounds to prove they were selling their body? Probably not. Sure, if all of the stereotypical signs pointed to "prostitute" (i.e. walking the same block/corner for hours, walking up to car windows and asking for a "date", etc.), condoms may close the case. But that doesn't mean they should.
True, the average citizen may not carry around more than one or two condoms during a night on the town, but what if they did? Would this be grounds to prove they were selling their body? Probably not. Sure, if all of the stereotypical signs pointed to "prostitute" (i.e. walking the same block/corner for hours, walking up to car windows and asking for a "date", etc.), condoms may close the case. But that doesn't mean they should.
Aside
from enacting a questionable standard of what constitutes justified
suspicion of legal offenders, the NYPD's job is to "serve and protect". In terms of sex work, however, who exactly is law enforcement trying to protect, and from what?
There
will always be a moral debate over whether sex work should be legalized
and regulated. Would it make everyone involved more safe? Yes. Does
that keep people from feeling uncomfortable about two consenting adults
exchanging money for sex acts? No.
And therein lies the other problem. Consenting adults is the assumption, not always the reality of sex work (here, prostitution).
This question of protection should be at the core of how law enforcement attacks sex trafficking; which involves pimps, underage girls, unsafe conditions, and lack of legal and institutional support.
This question of protection should be at the core of how law enforcement attacks sex trafficking; which involves pimps, underage girls, unsafe conditions, and lack of legal and institutional support.
Considering
the dangers of prostitution, the last thing the the law should do is
perpetuate the cycle of insecurity and discrimination.
Making
condoms criminal evidence disincentivizes their use by sex workers,
which in turn puts them and their johns at increased health risk, which
underhandedly exposes unassuming sex partners to disease, thereby
increasing the disdain for sex workers and their "dirty" practices.
There is still a lot of work to be done on the matter, and it is about time that the NYPD smarten up and quit working against the city's own public health initiatives.
As always, wrap it up, NYC. Be safe out there.
There is still a lot of work to be done on the matter, and it is about time that the NYPD smarten up and quit working against the city's own public health initiatives.
As always, wrap it up, NYC. Be safe out there.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment: